Pleural ADA2 demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy for tuberculous pleural effusion, with a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 147 (95% CI 76-284) and an area under the curve of 0.95.
Meta-Analysis
Does pleural ADA2 accurately diagnose tuberculous pleural effusion?
Pleural ADA2 is a highly accurate and reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion, though it should be used in conjunction with other clinical examinations.
Effect estimate: DOR 147 (95% CI 76-284)
Adenosine deaminase 2 (ADA2) is reported as a novel diagnostic biomarker for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) in many studies. This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the general diagnostic performance of pleural ADA2 in TPE. After searching for relevant studies that investigated the diagnostic performance of pleural ADA2 in TPE in several databases, we assessed and selected eligible studies to calculate pooled parameters by STATA 16.0 software. A final set of thirteen studies entirely met the inclusion standards and were used to calculate pooled parameters in our meta-analysis. Among them, there were nine English studies and four Chinese studies. The pooled parameters of pleural ADA2 in diagnosing TPE were summarized as follows: sensitivity, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95); specificity, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92–0.95); positive likelihood ratio, 13.9 (95% CI: 10.6–18.3); negative likelihood ratio, 0.09 (95% CI:0.06–0.16); diagnostic odds ratio, 147 (95% CI: 76–284); and the area under the curve, 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93–0.97). Pleural ADA2 is a reliable indicator with excellent accuracy in TPE diagnosis. However, we need to combine pleural ADA2 with diverse examinations to diagnose TPE in clinical practice.
Zeng et al. (Sat,) conducted a meta-analysis in Tuberculous pleural effusion. Pleural Adenosine deaminase 2 (ADA2) was evaluated on Diagnostic performance of pleural ADA2 (DOR 147, 95% CI 76-284). Pleural ADA2 demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy for tuberculous pleural effusion, with a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 147 (95% CI 76-284) and an area under the curve of 0.95.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: