Semi-automated OCT analysis software showed excellent agreement for lumen and media metrics but underestimated mean intima area compared to manual analysis (β = -0.289 mm2, p < 0.01).
Observational (n=23)
Does semi-automated OCT analysis software provide comparable measurements to manual software for evaluating cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant patients?
Semi-automated OCT software provides excellent agreement for lumen and media metrics compared to manual analysis, though it slightly underestimates intima metrics in heart transplant patients.
Effect estimate: β -0.289 mm2
p-value: p=< 0.01
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality enabling detailed evaluation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after heart transplantation (HTx). However, its clinical application remains hampered by time-consuming manual quantitative analysis. We aimed to validate a semi-automated quantitative OCT analysis software (Iowa Coronary Wall Analyzer, ICWA-OCT) to improve OCT-analysis in HTx patients. 23 patients underwent OCT evaluation of all three major coronary arteries at 3 months (3M) and 12 months (12M) after HTx. We analyzed OCT recordings using the semiautomatic software and compared results with measurements from a validated manual software. For semi-automated analysis, 31,228 frames from 114 vessels were available. The validation was based on a subset of 4287 matched frames. We applied mixed model statistics to accommodate the multilevel data structure with method as a fixed effect. Lumen (minimum, mean, maximum) and media (mean, maximum) metrics showed no significant differences. Mean and maximum intima area were underestimated by the semi-automated method (β-methodmean = − 0.289 mm2, p < 0.01; β-methodmax = − 0.695 mm2, p < 0.01). Bland–Altman analyses showed increasing semi-automatic underestimation of intima measurements with increasing intimal extent. Comparing 3M to 12M progression between methods, mean intimal area showed minor underestimation (β-methodmean = − 1.03 mm2, p = 0.04). Lumen and media metrics showed excellent agreement between the manual and semi-automated method. Intima metrics and progressions from 3M to 12M were slightly underestimated by the semi-automated OCT software with unknown clinical relevance. The semi-automated software has the future potential to provide robust and time-saving evaluation of CAV progression.
Jensen et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation (n=23). Semi-automated quantitative OCT analysis software (ICWA-OCT) vs. Validated manual software was evaluated on Mean intima area (β -0.289 mm2, p=< 0.01). Semi-automated OCT analysis software showed excellent agreement for lumen and media metrics but underestimated mean intima area compared to manual analysis (β = -0.289 mm2, p < 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: