Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this paper, a quality evaluation of three point cloud coding solutions based on machine learning technology is presented, notably, ADLPCC, PCCGEOCNN, and PCGC, as well as LUTSR, which uses multi-resolution Look-Up Tables. Moreover, the MPEG G-PCC was used as an anchor. A set of six point clouds, representing both landscapes and objects were coded using the five encoders at different bit rates, and a subjective test, where the distorted and reference point clouds were rotated in a video sequence side by side, is carried out to assess their performance. Furthermore, the performance of point cloud objective quality metrics that usually provide a good representation of the coded content is analyzed against the subjective evaluation results. The obtained results suggest that some of these metrics fail to provide a good representation of the perceived quality, and thus are not suitable to evaluate some distortions created by machine learning-based solutions. A comparison between the analyzed metrics and the type of represented scene or codec is also presented.
Prazeres et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: