Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Expanding on our previous work considering the impact of physical education policy on curriculum within the United States of America (U.S.), we undertake a critical reflection of the influence of policy work at the state level. Specifically, we focus on the impact of physical education policy (e.g. standards) within Ohio on curriculum, pedagogy, and state-mandated assessment. SB 210, signed into law in 2010, established the measurement of student success in attaining the benchmarks outlined in the Ohio Physical Education Academic Content Standards. We consider the impact of this legislation and resulting policy documents on the intra-active nature of curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment in the current socio-political environment in Ohio. We highlight the tension between developing socially just physical education curriculum and practices at a time when the state legislature is passing more conservative legislation within education and beyond.
Sutherland et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: