Long-term management strategies for myocardial infarction, including novel lipid-lowering and anti-thrombotic therapies, can further reduce adverse events despite ongoing residual risks.
This review provides an updated overview of long-term management strategies for MI patients, emphasizing the need to address residual risk through advanced lipid-lowering and anti-thrombotic therapies.
The outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) have substantially improved given the rapid progress that has occurred in revascularization techniques and secondary prevention, and the majority of MI patients subsequently enter a chronic stable phase. Therefore, the long-term management of patients with MI has become a core issue in daily clinical practice for cardiologists. The long-term incidence of adverse events can be further reduced using newly developed medications and therapies ranging from lipid-lowering agents (eg, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors) to anti-thrombotic treatments (eg, shortened dual anti-platelet therapy). However, a considerable number of patients still experience adverse events, as some residual risk can remain despite intensive secondary prevention, such as continuously elevated cholesterol levels, chronic cardiovascular inflammation, and rapid atherosclerosis progression due to increased plaque instability. Therefore, the present review sought to summarize and discuss recent advances in several key aspects regarding the long-term management of MI patients, with the expectation of clarifying the available treatment strategies for various clinical scenarios, examining the gaps between trial evidence and clinical practice, and providing possible directions for future research.
Chen et al. (Tue,) conducted a review in Myocardial infarction. Long-term management strategies for myocardial infarction, including novel lipid-lowering and anti-thrombotic therapies, can further reduce adverse events despite ongoing residual risks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: