Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVES: Measurement of high-sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponin (cTn) T and I is widely studied for cardiac assessment of stable populations. Recent data suggest clinical and prognostic discrepancies between both hs-cTn. We aimed at reviewing published studies with respect to underlying causes and clinical implications. CONTENT: We summarized current evidence on release and clearance mechanisms of cTnT and I, and on preanalytical and assay-related issues potentially portending to differences in measured concentrations. We also performed a systematic review of outcome studies comparing both hs-cTn in the general population, patients with congestive heart failure, stable coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK: For the interpretation of concentrations of hs-cTnT, stronger association with renal dysfunction compared to hs-cTnI should be considered. Hs-cTnT also appears to be a stronger indicator of general cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality. Hs-cTnI concentrations tend to be more sensitive to coronary artery disease and ischemic outcomes. These findings apparently reflect variations in the mechanisms of cardiac affections resulting in cTn release. Whether these differences are of clinically relevance remains to be elucidated. However, having the option of choosing between either hs-cTn might represent an option for framing individualized cardiac assessment in the future.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kai M. Eggers
General Cardiology
Ola Hammarsten
Cardiac Imaging
Bertil Lindahl
General Cardiology
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Uppsala University
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Uppsala University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eggers et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa37ce63148787cd2e670 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0778