Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Dataflow circuits implement dynamic scheduling and have recently been explored as an alternative to standard, statically scheduled high-level synthesis (HLS) solutions. In contrast to static HLS, dataflow circuits resolve memory dependencies during runtime by employing load-store queues (LSQs) at the memory interface. However, LSQs are extremely resource-expensive to implement in a spatial system and may cause notable frequency degradation. Therefore, there is a clear need to minimize their size and complexity, while still allowing the circuit to achieve a high computational rate. So far, designers resorted to manually tuning the LSQ depth (i.e., number of queue entries) to trade off area and performance; yet, this approach is evidently time-consuming and unfeasible for complex designs. In this work, we develop a strategy to automatically determine the most affordable LSQ depths in dataflow circuits while maintaining the best possible circuit throughput. We demonstrate our technique on benchmarks obtained from C code with different memory access patterns and show that it can effectively produce the desired Pareto-optimal design points.
Liu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.