Machine learning models, specifically Random Forests (87.03% accuracy), Gradient Boosting (86.21%), and CatBoost, provided the most reliable results for predicting future heart attacks.
Can machine learning models accurately predict heart failure in heart patients?
Machine learning models, particularly CatBoost, random forests, and gradient boosting, can predict heart failure with high accuracy.
About 26 million people worldwide experience its effects each year. Both cardiologists and surgeons have a tough time determining when heart failure will occur. Classification and prediction models applied to medical data allow for enhanced insight. Improved heart failure projection is a major goal of the research team using the heart disease dataset. The probability of heart failure is predicted using data mined from a medical database and processed by machine learning methods. It has been shown, through the use of this study and a comparative analysis, that heart disease may be predicted with high precision. In this study, researchers developed a machine learning model to improve the accuracy with which diseases like heart failure (HF) may be predicted. To rank the accuracy of linear models, we find that logistic regression (82.76 percent), SVM (67.24 percent), KNN (60.34 percent), GNB (79.31 percent), and MNB (72.41) perform best. These models are all examples of ensemble learning, with the most accurate being ET (70.31%), RF (87.03%), and GBC (86.21%). DT (ensemble learning models) achieves the highest degree of precision. CatBoost outperforms LGBM, HGBC, and XGB, all of which achieve 84.48% accuracy or better, while XGB achieves 84.48% accuracy using a gradient-based gradient method (GBG). LGBM has the highest accuracy rate (86.21 percent) (hypertuned ensemble learning models). A statistical analysis of all available algorithms found that CatBoost, random forests, and gradient boosting provided the most reliable results for predicting future heart attacks.
Ahmed et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Heart failure / Cardiovascular disease. Machine learning models (CatBoost, Random Forests, Gradient Boosting) vs. Other machine learning models (Logistic regression, SVM, KNN, etc.) was evaluated on Prediction accuracy for heart failure/disease. Machine learning models, specifically Random Forests (87.03% accuracy), Gradient Boosting (86.21%), and CatBoost, provided the most reliable results for predicting future heart attacks.