A hybrid EEG-based user authentication system using Isolation Forest and Random Forest classifiers achieved a final accuracy of 82.3%, a precision of 91.1%, and a recall of 75.3%.
A hybrid machine learning system using Isolation Forest and Random Forest classifiers can achieve 82.3% accuracy for EEG-based biometric user authentication.
In the current Information Age, it is usual to access our personal and professional information, such as bank account data or private documents, in a telematic manner. To ensure the privacy of this information, user authentication systems should be accurately developed. In this work, we focus on biometric authentication, as it depends on the user's inherent characteristics and, therefore, offers personalized authentication systems. Specifically, we propose an electrocardiogram (EEG)-based user authentication system by employing One-Class and Multi-Class Machine Learning classifiers. In this sense, the main novelty of this article is the introduction of Isolation Forest and Local Outlier Factor classifiers as new tools for user authentication and the investigation of their suitability with EEG data. Additionally, we identify the EEG channels and brainwaves with greater contribution to the authentication and compare them with the traditional dimensionality reduction techniques, Principal Component Analysis, and χ2 statistical test. In our final proposal, we elaborate on a hybrid system resistant to random forgery attacks using an Isolation Forest and a Random Forest classifiers, obtaining a final accuracy of 82.3%, a precision of 91.1% and a recall of 75.3%.
Hernández–Álvarez et al. (Sat,) conducted a other in User authentication. EEG-based user authentication system using Isolation Forest and Random Forest classifiers vs. Traditional dimensionality reduction techniques (PCA, χ2) was evaluated on Authentication accuracy, precision, and recall. A hybrid EEG-based user authentication system using Isolation Forest and Random Forest classifiers achieved a final accuracy of 82.3%, a precision of 91.1%, and a recall of 75.3%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: