Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Contrastive learning is an emerging and important self-supervised learning paradigm that has been successfully applied to sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR) because it can achieve competitive performance relative to supervised learning. Contrastive learning methods generally involve instance discrimination, which means that the instances are regarded as negatives of each other, and thus their representations are pulled away from each other during the training process. However, instance discrimination could cause overclustering, meaning that the representations of instances from the same class could be overly separated. To alleviate this overclustering phenomenon, we propose a new contrastive learning framework to select negatives by clustering in HAR, which is named clustering for contrastive learning in human activity recognition (ClusterCLHAR). First, ClusterCLHAR clusters the instance representations, and for each instance, only those from different clusters are regarded as negatives. Second, a new contrastive loss function is proposed to mask the same-cluster instances from the negative pairs. We evaluate ClusterCLHAR on three popular benchmark data sets: 1) USC-HAD; 2) MotionSense; and 3) UCI-HAR, using the mean F1-score as an evaluation metric for downstream tasks. The experimental results show that ClusterCLHAR outperforms all the state-of-the-art methods applied to HAR in self-supervised learning and semi-supervised learning.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jinqiang Wang
Tao Zhu
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Liming Chen
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
University of Ulster
University of Science and Technology Beijing
University of South China
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03177da3a0c1863b651659 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2023.3239945
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: