Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose of review To overview historical ascriptions and the current nosological status of melancholia, before reporting diagnostic strategy, biological marker and treatment studies. Recent findings As melancholia has never been satisfactorily differentiated by reliance on symptoms, strategies that adopt a more prototypic approach and incorporate illness correlates in conjunction with symptoms appear to provide greater precision in differentiating melancholic and nonmelancholic depression. An early indicative biological marker – hyperactive Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis functioning – remains supported, whereas a number of other recently proposed candidate markers require clarification. Implications for treatment from recent clinical trials are also discussed. Summary We note that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5 (DSM-5) definition of melancholia as for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV (DSM-IV) may be limited in its differentiating capacity and so compromise research into melancholia's causes and treatments. Clarifying melancholia's status, primary causes and differential treatment responsiveness awaits more precise definition of this depressive condition.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gordon Parker
Amelia Paterson
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
UNSW Sydney
Prince of Wales Hospital
Black Dog Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Parker et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a026a97a9294ab04901d337 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000024