Using the Intra-Cardiac Pattern Matching algorithm referencing from the right atrium and coronary sinus enables automated mapping of non-pulmonary vein foci with higher differentiation accuracy.
Does automated mapping using a dual-chamber reference technique improve differentiation accuracy for non-pulmonary vein foci in atrial fibrillation compared to manual annotation?
A novel dual-chamber reference technique using the CARTO 3 system enables automated, highly accurate mapping of non-pulmonary vein foci in atrial fibrillation, reducing operator dependence.
Key Teaching Points•In addition to pulmonary vein isolation, treatment of non–pulmonary vein foci is essential in the treatment of atrial fibrillation.•Various mapping techniques for non–pulmonary vein foci have been reported, but they all require manual annotation and are dependent on the competence of the operator.•By using the Intra-Cardiac Pattern Matching algorithm (CARTO 3; Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA) and referencing from 2 locations, the right atrium and coronary sinus, it is possible to perform an automated mapping with higher differentiation accuracy. •In addition to pulmonary vein isolation, treatment of non–pulmonary vein foci is essential in the treatment of atrial fibrillation.•Various mapping techniques for non–pulmonary vein foci have been reported, but they all require manual annotation and are dependent on the competence of the operator.•By using the Intra-Cardiac Pattern Matching algorithm (CARTO 3; Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA) and referencing from 2 locations, the right atrium and coronary sinus, it is possible to perform an automated mapping with higher differentiation accuracy.
Furuya et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in Atrial fibrillation. Intra-Cardiac Pattern Matching algorithm (CARTO 3) vs. Manual annotation was evaluated. Using the Intra-Cardiac Pattern Matching algorithm referencing from the right atrium and coronary sinus enables automated mapping of non-pulmonary vein foci with higher differentiation accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: