Patients with heart failure take a pooled mean of 5,040 steps per day (95% CI 4272-5807), with a 10-year increment in mean age associated with 1,121 fewer steps per day.
Meta-Analysis (n=7,775)
Patients with heart failure are a low-active population, averaging around 5040 steps per day, with activity levels declining significantly with age.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify habitual physical activity (PA) levels of patients with heart failure (HF) and assess the quality of reporting of device-assessed PA. METHODS: Eight electronic databases were searched up to 17 November 2021. Data on the study and population characteristics, method of PA measurement and PA metrics were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis (restricted maximum likelihood with Knapp-Hartung SE adjustment) was conducted. RESULTS: Seventy-five studies were included in the review (n=7775 patients with HF). Meta-analysis was restricted to mean steps per day, encompassing 27 studies (n=1720 patients with HF). Pooled mean steps per day were 5040 (95% CI: 4272 to 5807). The 95% prediction interval for mean steps per day in a future study was 1262 to 8817. Meta-regression at the study level revealed that a 10-year increment in the mean age of patients was associated with 1121 fewer steps per day (95% CI: 258 to 1984). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HF are a low-active population. These findings have implications for the way in which PA is targeted in patients with HF, and interventions should focus on addressing the age-related decline observed as well as increasing PA to improve HF symptoms and quality of life. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020167786.
Jordan et al. (Mon,) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=7,775). Habitual physical activity was evaluated on Mean steps per day (95% CI 4272 to 5807). Patients with heart failure take a pooled mean of 5,040 steps per day (95% CI 4272-5807), with a 10-year increment in mean age associated with 1,121 fewer steps per day.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: