The second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) significantly improved the mean image quality score (3.7 vs 2.5, p<0.001) compared to standard reconstruction in patients with a high heart rate at 40% R-R interval.
Observational (n=90)
Single-blind
No
Does the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) improve image quality and measurement accuracy of the aortic annulus in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing pre-TAVI cardiac CT?
The SSF2 whole-heart motion correction algorithm significantly improves the image quality and measurement accuracy of the aortic annulus on pre-TAVI cardiac CT, particularly in patients with high heart rates or during the systolic phase.
Absolute Event Rate: 3.7% vs 2.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
The main purpose of pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) cardiac computed tomography (CT) for patients with severe aortic stenosis is aortic annulus measurements. However, motion artifacts present a technical challenge because they can reduce the measurement accuracy of the aortic annulus. Therefore, we applied the recently developed second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SnapShot Freeze 2.0, SSF2) to pre-TAVI cardiac CT and investigated its clinical utility by stratified analysis of the patient's heart rate during scanning. We found that SSF2 reconstruction significantly reduced aortic annulus motion artifacts and improved the image quality and measurement accuracy compared to standard reconstruction, especially in patients with high heart rate or a 40% R-R interval (systolic phase). SSF2 may contribute to improving the measurement accuracy of the aortic annulus.
Matsumoto et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=90). Second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) vs. Standard reconstruction was evaluated on Image quality score (1-5 scale) at 40% R-R interval in patients with high heart rate (>70 bpm) (p=<0.001). The second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) significantly improved the mean image quality score (3.7 vs 2.5, p<0.001) compared to standard reconstruction in patients with a high heart rate at 40% R-R interval.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: