Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve showed similar 1-year rates of the primary composite outcome compared to the SAPIEN 3 valve (6.6% vs 9.5%; P=0.162).
Cohort (n=1,692)
Yes
Does TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve reduce 1-year mortality and composite clinical outcomes compared to the SAPIEN 3 valve in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI?
1,692 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra or SAPIEN 3 valve, followed for 1 year.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U) valve
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve
All-cause death and the composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke and hospitalisation for heart failure at 1 yearcomposite
The SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve provides similar 1-year clinical outcomes to the SAPIEN 3 valve but significantly reduces the incidence of mild paravalvular leak.
Absolute Event Rate: 6.6% vs 9.5%
p-value: p=0.162
BACKGROUND: Initial data about the performance of the new-generation SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U) valve are highly promising. However, evidence about the longer-term performance and safety of the S3U is scarce. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the 1-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the S3U compared with its predecessor, the SAPIEN 3 valve (S3). METHODS: The SAPIEN 3 Ultra registry included consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI at 12 European centres with the S3U or S3 between October 2016 and December 2020. One-to-one propensity score (PS) matching was performed to account for differences in baseline characteristics. The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause death and the composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke and hospitalisation for heart failure at 1 year. RESULTS: The overall study cohort encompassed 1,692 patients treated with either the S3U (n=519) or S3 (n=1,173). The PS-matched population had a total of 992 patients (496 per group). At 1 year, the rate of death from any cause was 4.9% in the S3U group and 6.3% in the S3 group (p=0.743). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the rates of the primary composite outcome (9.5% in the S3 group and 6.6% in the S3U group; p=0.162). The S3U was associated with lower rates of mild paravalvular leak (PVL) compared with the S3 (odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.44 to 0.88; p<0.01). No significant differences in transprosthetic gradients were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the S3, the S3U transcatheter heart valve was associated with similar 1-year clinical outcomes but reduced rates of mild PVL.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stefano Cannata
University of Rome Tor Vergata
Caterina Gandolfo
University of California, San Francisco
Flavio Ribichini
Interventional Cardiology
EuroIntervention
University of Milan
University of Padua
Erasmus MC
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cannata et al. (Sat,) reported a cohort. SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U) valve vs. SAPIEN 3 valve (S3) was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke and hospitalisation for heart failure at 1 year (p=0.162). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve showed similar 1-year rates of the primary composite outcome compared to the SAPIEN 3 valve (6.6% vs 9.5%; P=0.162).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a228811f56da133636cfd31 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-22-01022