Factor XI inhibitors showed dose-dependent reductions in thrombotic complications without dose-dependent increases in bleeding compared with low-molecular-weight heparin in phase 2 studies.
Venous and arterial thromboembolism
Factor XI inhibitors vs Low-molecular-weight heparin or apixaban
Therapeutic anticoagulation is indicated for a variety of circumstances and conditions in several fields of medicine to prevent or treat venous and arterial thromboembolism. According to the different mechanisms of action, the available parenteral and oral anticoagulant drugs share the common principle of hampering or blocking key steps of the coagulation cascade, which unavoidably comes at the price of an increased propensity to bleed. Hemorrhagic complications affect patient prognosis both directly and indirectly (ie, by preventing the adoption of an effective antithrombotic strategy). Inhibition of factor XI (FXI) has emerged as a strategy with the potential to uncouple the pharmacological effect and the adverse events of anticoagulant therapy. This observation is based on the differential contribution of FXI to thrombus amplification, in which it plays a major role, and hemostasis, in which it plays an ancillary role in final clot consolidation. Several agents were developed to inhibit FXI at different stages (ie, suppressing biosynthesis, preventing zymogen activation, or impeding the biological action of the active form), including antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, small synthetic molecules, natural peptides, and aptamers. Phase 2 studies of different classes of FXI inhibitors in orthopedic surgery suggested that dose-dependent reductions in thrombotic complications are not paralleled by dose-dependent increases in bleeding compared with low-molecular-weight heparin. Likewise, the FXI inhibitor asundexian was associated with lower rates of bleeding compared with the activated factor X inhibitor apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation, although no evidence of a therapeutic effect on stroke prevention is available so far. FXI inhibition could also be appealing for patients with other conditions, including end-stage renal disease, noncardioembolic stroke, or acute myocardial infarction, for which other phase 2 studies have been conducted. The balance between thromboprophylaxis and bleeding achieved by FXI inhibitors needs confirmation in large-scale phase 3 clinical trials powered for clinical end points. Several of such trials are ongoing or planned to define the role of FXI inhibitors in clinical practice and to clarify which FXI inhibitor may be most suited for each clinical indication. This article reviews the rationale, pharmacology, results of medium or small phase 2 studies, and future perspectives of drugs inhibiting FXI.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Antonio Greco
Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
Claudio Laudani
Interventional Cardiology
Marco Spagnolo
Interventional Cardiology
Circulation
Marconi University
Policlinico Universitario di Catania
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Greco et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Venous and arterial thromboembolism. Factor XI inhibitors vs. Low-molecular-weight heparin or apixaban was evaluated. Factor XI inhibitors showed dose-dependent reductions in thrombotic complications without dose-dependent increases in bleeding compared with low-molecular-weight heparin in phase 2 studies.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f9db9d03631df9ce9ccb3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.122.062353