Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective: To investigate the potential causal effects of long term plasma caffeine concentrations on adiposity, type 2 diabetes, and major cardiovascular diseases. Design: Two sample mendelian randomisation study. Setting: gene) and their association with the outcomes. Participants: Primarily individuals of European ancestry participating in cohorts contributing to genome-wide association study consortia. Main outcome measures: Outcomes studied were body mass index, whole body fat mass, whole body fat-free mass, type 2 diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke. Results: in body mass index, for every standard deviation increase in plasma caffeine) and whole body fat mass (beta -0.06 SD (-0.08 to -0.04), 1 SD equals about 9.5 kg; P<0.001) but not fat-free mass (beta -0.01 SD (-0.02 to -0.00), 1 SD equals about 11.5 kg; P=0.17). Higher genetically predicted plasma caffeine concentrations were associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes in two consortia (FinnGen and DIAMANTE), with a combined odds ratio of 0.81 ((95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.89); P<0.001). Approximately half (43%; 95% confidence interval 30% to 61%) of the effect of caffeine on type 2 diabetes was estimated to be mediated through body mass index reduction. No strong associations were reported between genetically predicted plasma caffeine concentrations and a risk of any of the studied cardiovascular diseases. Conclusions: Higher plasma caffeine concentrations might reduce adiposity and risk of type 2 diabetes. Further clinical study is warranted to investigate the translational potential of these findings towards reducing the burden of metabolic disease.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Susanna C. Larsson
Benjamin Woolf
Dipender Gill
BMJ Medicine
Imperial College London
Karolinska Institutet
University of Bristol
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Larsson et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ffd250e92f4a033c8535bb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000335
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: