CT-based Hounsfield unit values reflect the degree of steatohepatitis in patients with low-grade fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease worldwide. Ultrasound, the most used tool for diagnosing NAFLD, is operator-dependent and shows suboptimal performance in patients with mild steatosis. However, few studies have been conducted on whether alternative noninvasive methods are useful for diagnosing mild hepatic steatosis. Also, little is known about whether noninvasive tests are useful for grading the severity of hepatic steatosis or the degree of intrahepatic inflammation. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether the HSI, the FLI and HU values in CT could be used to discriminate mild hepatic steatosis and to evaluate the severity of hepatic steatosis or the degree of intrahepatic inflammation in patients with low-grade fatty liver disease using liver biopsy as a reference standard. METHODS: Demographic, laboratory, CT imaging, and histological data of patients who underwent liver resection or biopsy were analyzed. The performance of the HSI, HU values and the FLI for diagnosing mild hepatic steatosis was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Whether the degree of hepatic steatosis and intrahepatic inflammation could be predicted using the HSI, HU values or the FLI was also analyzed. Moreover, we validate the results using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction as an another reference standard. RESULTS: The AUROC for diagnosing mild hepatic steatosis was 0.810 (p < 0.001) for the HSI, 0.732 (p < 0.001) for liver HU value, 0.802 (p < 0.001) for the difference between liver and spleen HU value (L-S HU value) and 0.813 (p < 0.001) for the FLI. Liver HU and L-S HU values were negatively correlated with the percentage of hepatic steatosis and NAFLD activity score (NAS) and significantly different between steatosis grades and between NAS grades. The L-S HU value was demonstrated the good performance for grading the severity of hepatic steatosis and the degree of intrahepatic inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: The HU values on CT are feasible for stratifying hepatic fat content and evaluating the degree of intrahepatic inflammation, and the HSI and the FLI demonstrated good performance with high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing mild hepatic steatosis.