Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Traditional computational approaches to design chemical species are limited by the need to compute properties for a vast number of candidates, e.g., by discriminative modeling. Therefore, inverse design methods aim to start from the desired property and optimize a corresponding chemical structure. From a machine learning viewpoint, the inverse design problem can be addressed through so-called generative modeling. Mathematically, discriminative models are defined by learning the probability distribution function of properties given the molecular or material structure. In contrast, a generative model seeks to exploit the joint probability of a chemical species with target characteristics. The overarching idea of generative modeling is to implement a system that produces novel compounds that are expected to have a desired set of chemical features, effectively sidestepping issues found in the forward design process. In this contribution, we overview and critically analyze popular generative algorithms like generative adversarial networks, variational autoencoders, flow, and diffusion models. We highlight key differences between each of the models, provide insights into recent success stories, and discuss outstanding challenges for realizing generative modeling discovered solutions in chemical applications.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dylan M. Anstine
Olexandr Isayev
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Carnegie Mellon University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anstine et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d944299402b8412aa3cb4e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c13467
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: