Systolic blood pressure was not associated with heart rate in emergency department patients across any age category (e.g., -0.03 beats/min/10 mm Hg; 95% CI -0.13 to 0.07 for 18-50 years).
Cohort (n=84,108)
Yes
Is there an association between systolic blood pressure and heart rate in emergency department patients?
There is no reliable association between systolic blood pressure and heart rate in ED patients, challenging the traditional teaching that tachycardia is a reliable early sign of hypotension.
Mean Difference: -0.03 (95% CI -0.13–0.07)
BACKGROUND: Guidelines and textbooks assert that tachycardia is an early and reliable sign of hypotension, and an increased heart rate (HR) is believed to be an early warning sign for the development of shock, although this response may change by aging, pain, and stress. OBJECTIVE: To assess the unadjusted and adjusted associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR in emergency department (ED) patients of different age categories (18-50 years; 50-80 years; > 80 years). METHODS: A multicenter cohort study using the Netherlands Emergency department Evaluation Database (NEED) including all ED patients ≥ 18 years from three hospitals in whom HR and SBP were registered at arrival to the ED. Findings were validated in a Danish cohort including ED patients. In addition, a separate cohort was used including ED patients with a suspected infection who were hospitalized from whom measurement of SBP and HR were available prior to, during, and after ED treatment. Associations between SBP and HR were visualized and quantified with scatterplots and regression coefficients (95% confidence interval CI). RESULTS: A total of 81,750 ED patients were included from the NEED, and a total of 2358 patients with a suspected infection. No associations were found between SBP and HR in any age category (18-50 years: -0.03 beats/min/10 mm Hg, 95% CI -0.13-0.07, 51-80 years: -0.43 beats/min/10 mm Hg, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.50, > 80 years: -0.61 beats/min/10 mm Hg, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.71), nor in different subgroups of ED patient. No increase in HR existed with a decreasing SBP during ED treatment in ED patients with a suspected infection. CONCLUSION: No association between SBP and HR existed in ED patients of any age category, nor in ED patients who were hospitalized with a suspected infection, even during and after ED treatment. Emergency physicians may be misled by traditional concepts about HR disturbances because tachycardia may be absent in hypotension.
Candel et al. (Sat,) conducted a cohort in Emergency department patients (n=84,108). Systolic blood pressure was evaluated on Association between systolic blood pressure and heart rate (Regression coefficient -0.03 beats/min/10 mm Hg, 95% CI -0.13-0.07). Systolic blood pressure was not associated with heart rate in emergency department patients across any age category (e.g., -0.03 beats/min/10 mm Hg; 95% CI -0.13 to 0.07 for 18-50 years).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: