Explainable AI methods demonstrate that deep learning models for ECG classification learn features that align with established clinical diagnostic criteria, potentially increasing their clinical trustworthiness.
Despite their remarkable performance, deep neural networks remain unadopted in clinical practice, which is considered to be partially due to their lack of explainability. In this work, we apply explainable attribution methods to a pre-trained deep neural network for abnormality classification in 12-lead electrocardiography to open this "black box" and understand the relationship between model prediction and learned features. We classify data from two public databases (CPSC 2018, PTB-XL) and the attribution methods assign a "relevance score" to each sample of the classified signals. This allows analyzing what the network learned during training, for which we propose quantitative methods: average relevance scores over a) classes, b) leads, and c) average beats. The analyses of relevance scores for atrial fibrillation and left bundle branch block compared to healthy controls show that their mean values a) increase with higher classification probability and correspond to false classifications when around zero, and b) correspond to clinical recommendations regarding which lead to consider. Furthermore, c) visible P-waves and concordant T-waves result in clearly negative relevance scores in atrial fibrillation and left bundle branch block classification, respectively. Results are similar across both databases despite differences in study population and hardware. In summary, our analysis suggests that the DNN learned features similar to cardiology textbook knowledge.
Bender et al. (Mon,) studied this question.