Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE: Pelvic exenteration (PE) involves radical surgical resection of pelvic organs and is associated with considerable morbidity. Sarcopenia is recognised as a predictor of poor surgical outcomes. This study aimed to determine if preoperative sarcopenia is associated with postoperative complications after PE surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent PE with an available preoperative CT scan between May 2008 and November 2022 at the Royal Adelaide Hospital and St. Andrews Hospital in South Australia. Total Psoas Area Index (TPAI) was estimated by measuring the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscles at the level of the third lumbar vertebra on abdominal CT, normalised for patient height. Sarcopenia was diagnosed based on gender-specific TPAI cut-off values. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for major postoperative complications with a Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 3. RESULTS: In total, 128 patients who underwent PE were included, 90 of whom formed the non-sarcopenic group (NSG) and 38 the sarcopenic group (SG). Major postoperative complications (CD grade ≥ 3) occurred in 26 (20.3%) patients. There was no detectable association with sarcopenia and an increased risk of major postoperative complications. Preoperative hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.01) and a prolonged operative time (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with a major postoperative complication on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia is not a predictor of major postoperative complications in patients undergoing PE surgery. Further efforts aimed specifically at optimising preoperative nutrition may be warranted.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sergei Bedrikovetski
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Luke Traeger
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Alice A. Jay
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
The University of Adelaide
University of South Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bedrikovetski et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ac406e1320844825cf17c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02913-5
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: