Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Since the 1970s the world has seen the emergence of institutions and groups organized outside the state yet making claims on the polity and for the polity.Social movements such as those favoring women, the environment, and peace, or those opposing nuclear power and war become crystallized through the creation of organizations to implement their agendas.The existence of these NGOs (non-governmental organizations) has been examined by scholars in the developing countries and in Europe; interest on the part of US scholars is relatively recent and does not always grasp the core nature of NGOs.Some NGOs started with religious philosophies and sought to create spaces for ethical reflection; others emerged to mitigate the experience of political authoritarianism; still others are helping shape alternative visions of society and thus fit better as the crystallization of new social movements.There is variation in the objectives and performance of NGOs but the large majority of them are less concerned with their own self-interest than with collective gains.They also tend to produce flatter organizational structures and to foster steady participation in internal decision-making.In developing countries, they tend to be concerned with populations facing devalued or oppressed cultural expression and living under extremely poor conditions of living.And it is quite true, as Ilon (this issue) remarks, that they must balance alternative visions while operating in environments that are increasingly driven by market dynamics and profit rationales.
Nelly P. Stromquist (Thu,) studied this question.