Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
With the introduction of additive manufacturing (AM) methods, processes with the capability of 3D printing of metal materials were noticed. In general, AM processes with the ability to 3D print metals are more complex and costly in terms of equipment than processes that 3D print other materials (polymers and ceramics). Therefore, the use of 3D printing devices with less complexity and cost, such as extrusion-based 3D printers, for metal printing has attracted the attention of researchers. In this research, an extrusion-based 3D printer, equipped with a direct granule extruder system, was used for 3D printing of the feedstock of the metal powder injection molding (MPIM) process (with 93.7 % by weight of 440 C stainless steel metal powder). The optimal parameters of printing including linear speed (10 mm/s), temperature at the beginning (140 ℃) and end of the barrel (180 ℃), chamber's temperature (60 ℃), and nozzle diameter (0.5 mm) were determined experimentally. The debinding and sintering process was performed on 3D-printed samples. The samples are brittle after the sintering process, in such a way that the failure of the samples occurs by applying a small amount of force to them. According to the scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrograph of the fracture cross-section of the sintered samples, the number of cavities and defects in the samples was negligible and the presence of residual carbon can be seen in the sintered samples. According to the results of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX), the oxidation of iron and chromium elements as well as the presence of residual carbon (7.8 %), are the main factors for the incomplete sintering of the 3D printed samples.
Akhoundi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.