Female gender was associated with comparable 5-year survival (p=0.3) and freedom from re-intervention (p=0.3) compared to men after propensity matching in minimally invasive mitral surgery.
Cohort (n=302)
Does female gender increase the risk of mortality or re-intervention in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral surgery managed by a multidisciplinary heart team?
A multidisciplinary heart team approach to minimally invasive mitral surgery may eliminate the widely reported increased surgical risk in female patients, resulting in comparable mid-term survival and freedom from re-intervention.
p-value: p=0.3
Background: There is increasing evidence that female gender is an independent risk factor for cardiac surgery. Minimally invasive mitral surgery (MIV) has proven to have excellent long-term results, but little is known about gender-dependent outcomes. The aim of our study was to analyze our heart team's decision-based MIV-specialized cohort. Methods: In-hospital and follow-up data were retrospectively collected. The cohort was divided into gender groups and propensity-matched groups. Results: Between 22 July 2013 and 31 December 2022, 302 consecutive patients underwent MIV. Before matching, the total cohort showed that women were older, had a higher EuroSCORE II, were more symptomatic, and had more complex valve pathology and tricuspid regurgitation resulting in more valve replacements and tricuspid repairs. Intensive and hospital stays were longer. In-hospital deaths (n = 3, all women) were comparable, with more atrial fibrillation in women. The median follow-up time was 3.44 (0.008–8.9) years. The ejection fraction, NYHA, and recurrent regurgitation were low and comparable and atrial fibrillation more frequent in women. The calculated 5-year survival and freedom from re-intervention were comparable (p = 0.9 and p = 0.2). Propensity matching compared 101 well-balanced pairs; women still had fewer resections and more atrial fibrillation. During the follow-up, women had a better ejection fraction. The calculated 5-year survival and freedom from re-intervention were comparable (p = 0.3 and p = 0.3). Conclusions: Despite women being older and sicker, with more complex valve pathology and subsequent replacement, early and mid-term mortality and the need for reoperation were low and comparable before and after propensity matching, which might be the result of the MIV setting combined with our patient-tailored decision-making. We believe that a multidisciplinary heart team approach is crucial to optimize patient outcomes in MIV, and it might also reduce the widely reported increased surgical risk in female patients. Further studies are needed to prove our findings.
Passos et al. (Sat,) conducted a cohort in Minimally invasive mitral surgery (n=302). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on 5-year survival and freedom from re-intervention (p=0.3). Female gender was associated with comparable 5-year survival (p=0.3) and freedom from re-intervention (p=0.3) compared to men after propensity matching in minimally invasive mitral surgery.