Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Artificial intelligence systems are increasingly being applied to healthcare. In surgery, AI applications hold promise as tools to predict surgical outcomes, assess technical skills, or guide surgeons intraoperatively via computer vision. On the other hand, AI systems can also suffer from bias, compounding existing inequities in socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, religion, gender, disability, or sexual orientation. Bias particularly impacts disadvantaged populations, which can be subject to algorithmic predictions that are less accurate or underestimate the need for care. Thus, strategies for detecting and mitigating bias are pivotal for creating AI technology that is generalizable and fair. Here, we discuss a recent study that developed a new strategy to mitigate bias in surgical AI systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mirja Mittermaier
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Marium Raza
Harvard University
Joseph C. Kvedar
Boston University
npj Digital Medicine
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Harvard University
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mittermaier et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e88e84371aa676a3c4dc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00858-z
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: