Does deep learning analysis of bilateral finger photoplethysmography accurately identify coronary artery disease compared to conventional machine learning?
37 participants (21 with coronary artery disease)
Deep learning analysis of bilateral-site photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms ('DL-PPG') using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN, 'GoogLeNet')
Conventional machine learning (ML) classifier (K-nearest neighbour, K-NN, K = 9)
Classification performance for identifying coronary artery disease (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Kappa statistics)surrogate
Deep learning analysis of bilateral finger photoplethysmography waveforms shows promise as an accurate, low-cost, portable diagnostic tool for identifying coronary artery disease.
A proof-of-concept study assessing a novel approach to identify patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) using deep learning analysis of bilateral-site photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms (“DL-PPG”). DL-PPG was studied in 37 participants (with 21 having CAD). Scalogram ‘spectral’ images were derived from right and left index finger PPG measurements collected using a 3-phase protocol (baseline, unilateral arm pressure cuff occlusion, reactive hyperaemia flush). Artificial Intelligence (AI) analysis, namely deep learning, was employed for scalogram image classification using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN, “GoogLeNet”), with classification performance obtained using 10-fold stratified cross validation (CV). A conventional machine learning (ML) classifier (K-nearest neighbour, K-NN, K = 9) was also evaluated for comparison with the CNN deep learning methodology. Blood samples were also collected giving 2 biochemical biomarkers of endothelial function. Test sensitivities, specificities, accuracies, and Kappa statistics were determined. DL-PPG sensitivity was 80.9 % (95% CI, 78.6–83.0), specificity 87.7% (85.5–89.7), accuracy 83.8 % (82.2–85.3), and Kappa 0.68 (0.65–0.71). Comparative K-NN ML performance was 69.4% (95% CI, 68.7–70.1), 37.5% (36.7–38.2), 53.9% (53.3–54.4), and 0.069 (0.058–0.079), respectively. No differences between patients and controls were found for the biochemical biomarkers of endothelial function. Substantial overall agreement was found between DL-PPG classification and CAD angiography, with DL-PPG performance clearly better than for a conventional ML technique. Our deep learning classification approach, using only basic pre-processing of the PPG pulse waveforms before classification, could offer significant benefits for the diagnosis of CAD in a variety of clinical settings needing low-cost portable and easy-to-use diagnostics.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sadaf Iqbal
Hazara University
Sharad Agarwal
Royal Jubilee Hospital
Ian Purcell
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Newcastle University
Coventry University
Freeman Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Iqbal et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d277e43708a372d5dd1d8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104993