The machine learning model achieved an AUROC of 0.91 for diagnosing occlusion myocardial infarction, significantly outperforming clinicians (AUROC 0.79) and commercial systems (AUROC 0.78).
Observational
Yes
Does a machine learning model using pre-hospital 12-lead ECGs improve the diagnostic accuracy of occlusion myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain compared to practicing clinicians and commercial systems?
7,313 consecutive patients with chest pain evaluated in the pre-hospital setting (excluding cardiac arrest, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and confirmed pre-hospital STEMI), mean age ~59-60 years, ~45-47% female, from multiple clinical sites in the United States.
Machine learning model (Random Forest) using 73 morphological ECG features from pre-hospital 12-lead ECGs to estimate the probability of occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI).
ECG interpretation by practicing clinicians and a commercial ECG interpretation system cleared by the US FDA for 'Acute MI' diagnosis.
Presence of occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI), defined as a culprit coronary artery with TIMI flow grade 0-1, or TIMI 2 with >70% narrowing and peak 4th-generation troponin 5-10 ng/ml, adjudicated by independent reviewers.
A machine learning model using 12-lead ECGs significantly improved the detection and risk stratification of occlusion myocardial infarction in patients without STEMI compared to clinicians and commercial software.
Abstract Patients with occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) and no ST-elevation on presenting electrocardiogram (ECG) are increasing in numbers. These patients have a poor prognosis and would benefit from immediate reperfusion therapy, but, currently, there are no accurate tools to identify them during initial triage. Here we report, to our knowledge, the first observational cohort study to develop machine learning models for the ECG diagnosis of OMI. Using 7,313 consecutive patients from multiple clinical sites, we derived and externally validated an intelligent model that outperformed practicing clinicians and other widely used commercial interpretation systems, substantially boosting both precision and sensitivity. Our derived OMI risk score provided enhanced rule-in and rule-out accuracy relevant to routine care, and, when combined with the clinical judgment of trained emergency personnel, it helped correctly reclassify one in three patients with chest pain. ECG features driving our models were validated by clinical experts, providing plausible mechanistic links to myocardial injury.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Salah S. Al‐Zaiti
Christian Martin‐Gill
Jessica K. Zègre‐Hemsey
Nature Medicine
Harvard University
University of Toronto
University of Minnesota
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Al‐Zaiti et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) (n=7,313). Machine learning model for ECG diagnosis of OMI vs. Practicing clinicians and commercial ECG interpretation systems was evaluated on ECG diagnosis accuracy for occlusion myocardial infarction (AUROC 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.96, p=<0.001). The machine learning model achieved an AUROC of 0.91 for diagnosing occlusion myocardial infarction, significantly outperforming clinicians (AUROC 0.79) and commercial systems (AUROC 0.78).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6966c5c1b831ad8d8c6a77df — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02396-3