Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights conceive of human rights due diligence (HRDD) as covering potential impacts across value chains, including downstream. The proposed EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive and the revision process of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises have sparked renewed discussion on how and whether companies should conduct HRDD downstream to identify and prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts. Whilst some debate has occurred previously on downstream HRDD, this has predominantly centred on specific sectors, products and services where the links to egregious human rights harms may be more readily identifiable. This piece seeks to inform the current debate by broadening the examples of sectors, products and services and current business practice which demonstrate the critical need for, and ability of, companies to consider human rights risks downstream.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Benn F. Hogan
Joanna Reyes
Business and Human Rights Journal
Trinity College Dublin
Trinity College
Global Initiative on Psychiatry
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hogan et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a126b0ebb918b6e5b674ba4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2023.27
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: