A deep learning model for myocardium segmentation on T1 and T2 mapping CMR images achieved an 86% mean Dice score, compared to a 90% mean Dice score from expert consensus.
Does a deep learning model achieve comparable accuracy to expert consensus for myocardium segmentation on T1 and T2 mapping CMR images?
A deep learning model for myocardium segmentation on T1 and T2 mapping CMR images achieved an 86% mean Dice score, approaching the 90% accuracy of expert consensus.
Absolute Event Rate: 86% vs 90%
Introduction: Structural and functional heart abnormalities can be examined non-invasively with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Thanks to the development of MR devices, diagnostic scans can capture more and more relevant information about possible heart diseases. T1 and T2 mapping are such novel technology, providing tissue specific information even without the administration of contrast material. Artificial intelligence solutions based on deep learning have demonstrated state-of-the-art results in many application areas, including medical imaging. More specifically, automated tools applied at cine sequences have revolutionized volumetric CMR reporting in the past five years. Applying deep learning models to T1 and T2 mapping images can similarly improve the efficiency of post-processing pipelines and consequently facilitate diagnostic processes. Methods: In this paper, we introduce a deep learning model for myocardium segmentation trained on over 7,000 raw CMR images from 262 subjects of heterogeneous disease etiology. The data were labeled by three experts. As part of the evaluation, Dice score and Hausdorff distance among experts is calculated, and the expert consensus is compared with the model's predictions. Results: Our deep learning method achieves 86% mean Dice score, while contours provided by three experts on the same data show 90% mean Dice score. The method's accuracy is consistent across epicardial and endocardial contours, and on basal, midventricular slices, with only 5% lower results on apical slices, which are often challenging even for experts. Conclusions: We trained and evaluated a deep learning based segmentation model on 262 heterogeneous CMR cases. Applying deep neural networks to T1 and T2 mapping could similarly improve diagnostic practices. Using the fine details of T1 and T2 mapping images and high-quality labels, the objective of this research is to approach human segmentation accuracy with deep learning.
Kalapos et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Heterogeneous cardiovascular disease etiology (n=262). Deep learning model for myocardium segmentation vs. Expert consensus was evaluated on Mean Dice score. A deep learning model for myocardium segmentation on T1 and T2 mapping CMR images achieved an 86% mean Dice score, compared to a 90% mean Dice score from expert consensus.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: