Office blood pressure measurement was the most frequently used method to diagnose hypertension, but diagnoses were often incomplete, with 85.2% to 96.8% based on only one or two measurements.
Cohort (n=2,000)
Yes
In primary care, hypertension is frequently diagnosed and treated based on incomplete office blood pressure measurements, highlighting a significant gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice.
Abstract Background In the adult population, about 50% have hypertension, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and subsequent premature death. Little is known about the quality of the methods used to diagnose hypertension in primary care. Objectives The objective was to assess the completeness of the method of systolic blood pressure measurements that were used to diagnose patients with new-onset hypertension and to assess the correct interpretation of the blood pressure level. Methods A population-based cohort study using electronic medical records of patients in primary care aged between 40 and 70 years with a new-onset of hypertension in the years 2012, 2016, 2019, and 2020. A visual chart review of the electronic medical records was used to assess the methods employed to diagnose hypertension in a random sample of 500 patients. The blood pressure measurement method was considered complete if three or more valid office blood pressure measurements (OBPM) were performed, or home-based blood pressure measurements (HBPM), the office- based 30-minute method (OBP30), or 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements (24H-ABPM) were used. Results In all study years, OBPM was the most frequently used method to diagnose new-onset hypertension in patients. The OBP-30 method was used in 0.4% (2012), 4.2% (2016), 10.6% (2019), and 9.8% (2020) of patients respectively, 24H-ABPM in 16.0%, 22.2%, 17.2%, and 19.0% of patients and HBPM measurements in 5.4%, 8.4%, 7.6%, and 7.8% of patients, respectively. A diagnosis of hypertension based on only one or two office measurements occurred in 85.2% (2012), 87.9% (2016), 94.4% (2019), and 96.8% (2020) of all patients with OBPM. In cases of incomplete measurement and incorrect interpretation, medication was still started in 64% of cases in 2012, 56% (2016), 60% (2019), and 73% (2020). Conclusion OBPM is still the most often used method to diagnose hypertension in primary care. The diagnosis was often incomplete or misinterpreted using incorrect cut-off levels. A small improvement occurred between 2012 and 2016 but no further progress was seen in 2019 or 2020. If hypertension is inappropriately diagnosed, it may result in under treatment or in prolonged, unnecessary treatment of patients. There is room for improvement.
Voorbrood et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in New-onset hypertension (n=2,000). Diagnostic methods for hypertension (OBPM, OBP30, HBPM, 24H-ABPM) was evaluated on Completeness of the method of systolic blood pressure measurements and correct interpretation of the blood pressure level. Office blood pressure measurement was the most frequently used method to diagnose hypertension, but diagnoses were often incomplete, with 85.2% to 96.8% based on only one or two measurements.