Does the ventricular electrograms duration map (VEDUM) accurately identify arrhythmogenic substrate in patients referred for VT ablation?
VEDUM maps during sinus or paced rhythm can identify areas of slow and inhomogeneous conduction that correlate highly with VT isthmuses, offering a potential target for ablation.
BACKGROUND: The analysis of the wave-front activation patterns is crucial for the comprehension and treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). The ventricular electrograms duration map (VEDUM) is a potential method to identify areas (VEDUM area) with slow and inhomogeneous activation. There is no available data on the characteristics and the arrhythmogenic role of VEDUM areas identified during sinus/paced rhythm. METHODS: Patients referred for VT ablation were enrolled at 3 different centers. VEDUM maps during sinus/paced rhythm as well as substrate and functional maps were created; activation mapping was performed for all hemodynamically tolerated VT. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (mean age:70.1±9.4 years; males 93.8%) were enrolled. The VEDUM approach was achieved in all patients and the mean size of the VEDUM area was 12.1±6.9 cm 2 (interquartile range, 7.8–14.9 cm 2 ). A significative difference was observed between the electrogram duration in the VEDUM area and the normal tissue (163.7 ms interquartile range, 142.3–199.2 ms; versus 65.5 ms interquartile range, 59.5–76.2 ms; P <0.001). The VEDUM area was visualized in a dense scar (<0.5 mV) in 19 (59.4%) patients. A deceleration zone and late potentials were recorded inside the VEDUM area in 56.3% and 81.3%, respectively. When a complete VT activation mapping was available, the isthmus projected in the VEDUM area in 93.5% of patients; 8 of them had multiple VTs mapped and in the 87.5% all VT isthmuses were included in the VEDUM area. CONCLUSIONS: VEDUM maps allow the identification of discrete areas of inhomogeneous and slow conduction. They represent a potential target for VT ablation, including patients with multiple morphologies.
Rossi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: