Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
These small studies suggest that for people with LRTI affecting tissues of the head, neck, bladder and rectum, HBOT may be associated with improved outcomes (low- to moderate-certainty evidence). HBOT may also result in a reduced risk of wound dehiscence and a modest reduction in pain following head and neck irradiation. However, HBOT is unlikely to influence the risk of death in the short term. HBOT also carries a risk of adverse events, including an increased risk of a reduction in visual acuity (usually temporary) and of ear barotrauma on compression. Hence, the application of HBOT to selected participants may be justified. The small number of studies and participants, and the methodological and reporting inadequacies of some of the primary studies included in this review demand a cautious interpretation. More information is required on the subset of disease severity and tissue type affected that is most likely to benefit from this therapy, the time for which we can expect any benefits to persist and the most appropriate oxygen dose. Further research is required to establish the optimum participant selection and timing of any therapy. An economic evaluation should also be undertaken.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhiliang Caleb Lin
Michael H Bennett
Glen C. Hawkins
Cochrane library
The Alfred Hospital
Prince of Wales Hospital
University of Toledo Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9d6321ad561c67368528a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005005.pub5