An LSTM deep learning model achieved 95.67% and 88.70% accuracy in classifying stress on two and three levels, respectively, outperforming classic machine learning models.
Stress
LSTM deep learning model vs Random Forest and other classic machine learning models
Accuracy in classifying stress on two levels
Absolute Event Rate: 95.67% vs 93.77%
Stress is a significant health issue that affect both physical and mental health. The application of deep learning and machine learning techniques for physiological signal processing has become popular in detecting and classifying stress. In this research, we developed a fresh approach to classify stress on multiple levels using advanced machine and deep learning models. The PhysioNet SRA database was used to collect physiological signals which were pre-processed using a pipeline of filters and normalisation techniques to remove noise and artefacts. These signals were subjected to various feature extraction algorithms to determine the most pertinent characteristics for categorisation. On the acquired features, dimensionality reduction techniques were applied in order to further improve classification performance. The evaluation of Random Forest model outscored all the other classic ML models, achieving an accuracy of 93.77% and 82.42% in classifying stress on two levels and three levels respectively. Among the DL models, the LSTM model is most effective, achieving an accuracy of 95.67% and 88.70% in classifying stress on two levels and three levels respectively. The proposed approach provides a more comprehensive analysis of stress levels, which can help individuals manage stress more effectively.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lovish Arya
Harshal Chowdhary
Ishita Agrawal
SRM University
Delhi Technological University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Arya et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Stress. LSTM deep learning model vs. Random Forest and other classic machine learning models was evaluated on Accuracy in classifying stress on two levels. An LSTM deep learning model achieved 95.67% and 88.70% accuracy in classifying stress on two and three levels, respectively, outperforming classic machine learning models.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d9c7b7328fa9a742fc118 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/seai59139.2023.10217367
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: