Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In recent work, theories of case-based legal reasoning have been applied to the development of explainable artificial intelligence methods, through the analogy of training examples as previously decided cases. One such theory is that of precedential constraint. A downside of this theory with respect to this application is that it performs single-step reasoning, moving directly from the case base to an outcome. For this reason we propose a generalization of the theory of precedential constraint which allows multi-step reasoning, moving from the case base through a series of intermediate legal concepts before arriving at an outcome. Our generalization revolves around the notion of factor hierarchy, so we call this hierarchical precedential constraint. We present the theory, demonstrate its applicability to case-based legal reasoning, and perform a preliminary analysis of its theoretical properties.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wijnand van Woerkom
Utrecht University
Davide Grossi
University of Groningen
Henry Prakken
Utrecht University
University of Amsterdam
Utrecht University
University of Groningen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Woerkom et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69de84d77ed287395e5596d4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595154