A review of the lethal triad in trauma suggests that only acidosis is a reliable hard sign for damage control surgery, indicating severe hypoxemia and tissue hypoxia.
This review challenges the traditional concept of the lethal triad in trauma, arguing that only acidosis is a reliable indicator for damage control surgery.
The last three decades of literature in trauma have been erroneously hammered by the belief the lethal triad (LT) of acidosis, hypothermia and coagulopathy was, as claimed originally, the statutory rationale underlying for the application of damage control surgery (DCS) strategy. As a matter of fact, the LT is not all lethal: only acidosis is lethal and a reliable hard sign for DCS, indicating severe levels of hypoxemia and tissues hypoxia. The mainstream flow of events leading to exitus in hemorragic shock pass through macro and microcirculation dynamics, oxygen, acidosis, and ischemia-reperfusion toxemia. It is solely by interfering or manipulating these variables dynamics that we can decrease morbidity and mortality. A solid synoptic list of the indications and timing of DCS has been elaborated.
Fabrizio Bonanno (Thu,) conducted a review in Trauma and hemorrhagic shock. Damage control surgery was evaluated. A review of the lethal triad in trauma suggests that only acidosis is a reliable hard sign for damage control surgery, indicating severe hypoxemia and tissue hypoxia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: