Changing the medical model of disability to the normalization model of disability: clarifying the past to create a new future direction

The medical model of disability describes a widespread approach to disability common since the 1800s that views disabilities of all sorts as abnormalities that need to be cured or eradicated.Under the medical model of disability, medical care for disabled people has focused on making the bodies and brains of disabled people conform as closely as possible to society's idea of a normal person.This emphasis on normalization was and continues to be extremely harmful to disabled people.In this paper, I propose retroactively changing the term medical model of disability to normalization model of disability to avoid conflation with useful medical care and to highlight normalization as the quintessential harm of the model. Points of interest Disability models are mental maps that shape all aspects of life for disabled people. The medical model of disability has dominated societies for a long time. The medical model sees disabilities as abnormal and tries to make disabled people conform to our idea of a normal body or brain. Trying to make disabled people just like so-called normal people is very harmful and hurts disabled people. In this article, the author suggests we change the name of the medical model of disability to the normalization model of disability so that everyone understands clearly just how harmful normalization is. The author also suggests we change the name because disabled people might want medical care in some circumstances.Using the term 'medical model' can cause confusion because the medical model was and continues to be very bad, but not all medical care is bad.