Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
pro- and anti-inflammatory CRP bioactivities, we herein provide an interpretation of how distinctive CRP isoforms may have affected reported results. We argue that pro-inflammatory amplification mechanisms are consistent with the biofunction of mCRP, while weak anti-inflammatory mechanisms are consistent with pCRP. The interplay of each CRP isoform with specific immune cells (platelets, neutrophils, monocytes, endothelial cells, natural killer cells) and mechanisms of the innate immune system (complement), as well as differences in mCRP and pCRP ligand recognition and effector functions are discussed. This review will serve as a revised understanding of the structure-function relationship between CRP isoforms as related to inflammation and innate immunity mechanisms.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Margaret E. Olson
Roosevelt University
Mary G. Hornick
Roosevelt University
Ashley Stefanski
Roosevelt University
Frontiers in Immunology
Roosevelt University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Olson et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0315a698cafe0df5756cff — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1264383