Low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction produced comparable, non-significant improvements to high-intensity training in 6-Minute Walk Test distance (81 m vs 62 m).
RCT (n=32)
single-blinded
randomly allocated
Does low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction improve motor function and walking capacity in ischemic stroke survivors compared to high-intensity resistance training?
Low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction yields comparable improvements in functional mobility and walking capacity to high-intensity resistance training in ischemic stroke survivors.
Absolute Event Rate: 81% vs 62%
BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training can temporarily reduce cortical GABA concentrations and increase the size of motor volleys to deafferented muscles, which can promote motor recovery in stroke survivors. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of low-intensity resistance training with BFR (LIRT-BFR) on lower extremity muscle strength, balance, functional mobility, walking capacity, gait speed, anxiety, and depression in stroke survivors and to compare the results with high-intensity resistance training (HIRT). METHOD: It was a two-arm, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial in which 32 ischemic stroke participants were randomly allocated to LIRT-BFR or HIRT group. The LIRT-BFR group received low load resistance training (40% of 1-Repetition Maximum (1-RM)) with BFR, whereas HIRT group received high load resistance training (80% of 1-RM). The 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT), five-time sit-to-stand test (5TSTST), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and Barthel index were the primary outcome measures. The secondary outcome measures included gait speed (m/s), stride length (cm), cadence (steps/min), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression. RESULTS: < 0.05). The LIRT-BFR group showed a slightly greater, but non-significant, improvement as compared to the HIRT group in terms of mean change observed in 6-MWT (81 m vs 62 m), 5TSTST (-5.27 vs -4.81), gait speed (0.19 vs 0.12), stride length (18 vs 13), and cadence (8 vs 6). No adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: LIRT-BFR produced a significant improvement in muscle strength, balance, walking capacity, and anxiety and depression in ischemic stroke patients, and the improvement are comparable to HIRT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05281679.
Ahmed et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in ischemic stroke (n=32). Low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction (LIRT-BFR) vs. High-intensity resistance training (HIRT) (80% of 1-RM) was evaluated on 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT), five-time sit-to-stand test (5TSTST), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and Barthel index. Low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction produced comparable, non-significant improvements to high-intensity training in 6-Minute Walk Test distance (81 m vs 62 m).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: