Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The electrocatalytic nitrate (NO3-) reduction reaction (eNITRR) is a promising method for ammonia synthesis. However, its efficacy is currently limited due to poor selectivity, largely caused by the inherent complexity of the multiple-electron processes involved. To address these issues, oxygen-vacancy-rich LaFe0.9M0.1O3-δ (M = Co, Ni, and Cu) perovskite submicrofibers have been designed from the starting material LaFeO3-δ (LF) by a B-site substitution strategy and used as the eNITRR electrocatalyst. Consequently, the LaFe0.9Cu0.1O3-δ (LF0.9Cu0.1) submicrofibers with a stronger Fe-O hybridization, more oxygen vacancies, and more positive surface potential exhibit a higher ammonia yield rate of 349 ± 15 μg h-1 mg-1cat. and a Faradaic efficiency of 48 ± 2% than LF submicrofibers. The COMSOL Multiphysics simulations demonstrate that the more positive surface of LF0.9Cu0.1 submicrofibers can induce NO3- enrichment and suppress the competing hydrogen evolution reaction. By combining a variety of in situ characterizations and density functional theory calculations, the eNITRR mechanism is revealed, where the first proton-electron coupling step (*NO3 + H+ + e- → *HNO3) is the rate-determining step with a reduced energy barrier of 1.83 eV. This work highlights the positive effect of cation substitution in promoting eNITRR properties of perovskites and provides new insights into the studies of perovskite-type electrocatalytic ammonia synthesis catalysts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kaibin Chu
Jiangnan University
Wei Zong
Qiqihar University
Guohao Xue
Jiangnan University
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Harvard University
KU Leuven
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8cc12f39dfae3cad17cc3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c06402
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: