Explainable Legal Case Matching via Graph Optimal Transport

Providing human-understandable explanations for the matching predictions is still challenging for current legal case matching methods. One difficulty is that legal cases are semi-structured text documents with complicated case-case and case-law article correlations. To tackle the issue, we propose a novel graph optimal transport (GOT)-based legal case matching model that is able to provide not only the matching predictions but also plausible and faithful explanations for the prediction. The model, called GEIOT-Match, first constructs a heterogeneous graph to explicitly represent the semi-structured nature of legal cases and their associations with the law articles. Therefore, matching two legal cases amounts to identifying the rationales from the paired legal case sub-graphs in the heterogeneous graph and then aligning between them. An inverse optimal transport (IOT) model on graphs is learned to extract rationales from paired legal cases. The extracted rationales and the heterogeneous graph demonstrate the key legal characteristics of legal cases, which can be further used to conduct matching and generate explanations for the matching. Experimental results showed that GEIOT-Match outperformed state-of-the-art baselines in terms of matching prediction, rationale extraction, and natural language explanation generation.