Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A growing number of organizations are prioritizing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and antiracism in the workplace, including investing resources in DEI or antiracism training. However, such trainings vary widely in curriculum, objectives, delivery, and evaluation, with little known about the efficacy of existing trainings. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate training characteristics, measures, and results of peer-reviewed studies (published between 2000 and 2022) testing DEI or antiracism trainings. Studies were identified using Google Scholar, JSTOR, and a university library database. Key search terms included "diversity, equity, and inclusion training"; "antiracism training"; and "effect," "impact," "outcome," or "evaluation." The search yielded N = 15 DEI training studies and N = 8 antiracism training studies. The majority of studies (75% of antiracism training; 66.6% of DEI training) utilized a one-time training session. Content, objectives, measures, and impact varied widely across studies. Randomized designs were uncommon (13%), and over 70% of studies had majority female participants. Findings highlight several strategies to advance the field of DEI and antiracism training, such as shifting curriculum from targeting individual knowledge to supporting behavioral and organizational change, providing longitudinal training, standardizing outcomes of interest, and implementing rigorous evaluation methods.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Monica L. Wang
Boston University
A.S.P. Gomes
Boston University
Marielis Rosa
Boston University
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Harvard University
Boston University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12b50f92637892a9a71b48 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibad061
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: