Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Millimeter-wave (mmWave) communication systems rely on narrow beams to achieve sufficient receive signal power. Adjusting these beams is typically associated with large training overhead, which becomes particularly critical for highly-mobile applications. Beam selection can benefit from the knowledge of user positions to reduce the overhead in mm Wave beam training. Prior work, however, studied this problem using only synthetic data that does not accurately represent real-world measurements. In this paper, we revisit the position-aided beam prediction problem in light of real-world measurements with commercial-off-the-shelf GPS to derive insights into how much beam training overhead can be saved in practice. We also compare algorithms that perform well in synthetic data but fail to generalize with real data, and attempt to answer what factors cause inference degradation. Further, we propose a machine learning evaluation metric that better captures the end communication system objective. This work aims at closing the gap between reality and simulations in position-aided beam alignment.
Morais et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: