The European Heart Journal editors propose five minimal quality criteria for AI-based prediction models: complete reporting, clear intended use, rigorous validation, adequate sample size, and open code.
To raise the quality of clinical artificial intelligence (AI) prediction modelling studies in the cardiovascular health domain and thereby improve their impact and relevancy, the editors for digital health, innovation, and quality standards of the European Heart Journal propose five minimal quality criteria for AI-based prediction model development and validation studies: complete reporting, carefully defined intended use of the model, rigorous validation, large enough sample size, and openness of code and software.
Royen et al. (Sat,) conducted a editorial in Cardiovascular disease. Artificial intelligence-based prediction models was evaluated. The European Heart Journal editors propose five minimal quality criteria for AI-based prediction models: complete reporting, clear intended use, rigorous validation, adequate sample size, and open code.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: