Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This manuscript critically examines the adoption of generative AI tools, notably ChatGPT and Bard, within public administration research, especially in street-level bureaucracy. While these tools offer revolutionary insights into bureaucratic behaviors and decision-making, they pose significant ethical dilemmas, including potential biases and data privacy concerns. The paper offers comprehensive recommendations designed to help researchers navigate these challenges, emphasizing the need for robust data validation, enhanced transparency, and continuous adherence to evolving ethical standards. The overarching aim is to facilitate responsible AI integration, ensuring research methodologies' efficacy and preserving ethical integrity in public administration inquiries.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mohammed Salah
Shaqra University
Fadi Abdelfattah
Modern College of Business and Science
Hussan Al Halbusi
Ahmed Bin Mohammed Military College
International Journal of Public Administration
Ahmed Bin Mohammed Military College
Modern College of Business and Science
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Salah et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ffe789e54838161fd8615 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2274801