Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
For conducting an analysis of the experimental data, it is imperative to establish a mathematical correlation between the input and output variables. This entails executing a curve fitting or regression procedure on the data, for which numerous methodologies exist. Within the scope of present investigation, the design variables encompass the solid volume fraction (φ) and temperature. Thermal conductivity (TC) of MWCNT-CuO-CeO2 (20-40-40)/water hybrid nanofluid (HNF) is also the objective function. Ten different types of regressors are utilized for regression operations which are Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Decision Tree (D-Tree), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Radial Basis Function (RBF), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Multivariate Polynomial Regression (MPR) and Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH). Once the governing equations linking the design variables and the objective functions have been established, these equations can be employed to forecast the simulation data. By substituting the above input values into the equations, we can calculate the corresponding output values for the TC of the HNF. The results obtained from the MPR algorithm are compared to the experimental data. For the GPR, MLR, D-Tree, ELM, MPR, MLP, RBF, SVM, ANFIS, and GMDH algorithms, the maximum margin of error is found to be 0.031, 0.02579, 0.028946, 0.033889, 0.01568, 0.02515, 0.03485, 0.03, 0.0385, and 0.0178, respectively. Moreover, the kernel density estimation diagram indicates the gap between experimental data and data predicted by regression algorithms. Finally, it is evident that the MPR algorithm demonstrates to have a reduced residual dispersion, with the residuals approaching zero.
Rostamzadeh‐Renani et al. (Thu,) studied this question.