Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract People keep secrets for years with significant ramifications if the information were ever revealed. How can we understand the effects of long‐held secrets? The current paper presents a new perspective on secrecy and how it can be studied. By examining the multiple experiences people have with their multiple secrets, we can obtain a fuller view of how secrets affect people in daily life. Additionally, by examining a set of common secrets, across people, we can understand how secrets (i.e., exemplars) differ from one another, and we can study how those differences relate to important variables like well‐being. That is, rather than study a specific secret or secrecy situation (which will have limited generalizability), we can seek to study the entire universe of secrets, both to make generalizations across that universe and to compare different secrets to one another. Using the question of whether secrecy causes lower well‐being, we discuss this Multiple Exemplar Measurement approach alongside other methodologies. We highlight the many benefits of taking an exemplar‐level perspective, both for understanding secrecy and other psychological phenomena more broadly.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael L. Slepian
Columbia University
Elise K. Kalokerinos
The University of Queensland
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Columbia University
The University of Melbourne
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Slepian et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c4a7100ee29383e9dbd16 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12922
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: