Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This Article deals with selected issues of judicial protection that arise in the context of the sanctions adopted by the EU against Russia and Belarus after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. As most cases challenging the sanctions are pending, this Article draws lessons from the previous case law on EU restrictive measures. It explores what aspects of the sanctions escape judicial review, then profiles of external (or formal) legality of the sanctions, of internal (or substantive) legality, and concludes by assessing the overall role of the Court in EU foreign affairs. The discussion shows that the case law in this area of EU administrative law converges to a great extent with other areas of EU competence, but tensions remain in how the Court may impose substantial constraints to executive discretion in the field of Common Foreign and Security Policy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Luigi Lonardo
University College Cork
Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies
University College Cork
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Luigi Lonardo (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a125bc792637892a9a65dc1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2023.11