Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Fraud against individuals is a major and growing problem. Understanding why some people fall victim to fraud, while others do not, is crucial in developing effective prevention strategies. We therefore studied the effect of socio-demographics, personality traits, mental, general, and cognitive health, routine Internet activities, and prior fraud knowledge on general fraud victimization, susceptibility to fraud attempts, and exposure to fraud attempts. We modeled data from a Dutch fraud victimization survey, using an exhaustive fraud taxonomy and a representative sample for which an elaborate set of historical background variables were available. Results show that there is no clear personality or other profile of those most at risk for fraud, except for having low self-control, having a non-Western, immigrant background or being a frequent Internet user. Improving fraud knowledge could be an effective way to prevent fraud victimization by reducing susceptibility to attempts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Luka Koning
University of Twente
Marianne Junger
University of Twente
Bernard P. Veldkamp
University of Twente
International Review of Victimology
University of Twente
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Koning et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a111309eeb8b6643916a57a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580231215839
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: