Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Introduction Regenerative agriculture commonly aims to increase soil carbon sequestration, with potential benefits for human and ecosystem health, climate mitigation, and biodiversity. However, the effectiveness of various regenerative practices at increasing carbon sequestration is unclear. Methods This study identified and quantified the yearly soil carbon sequestration rate of regenerative practices in arable cropland and vineyard ecosystems through a literature review. We examined N =345 soil carbon sequestration measures across seven regenerative practices – agroforestry, cover cropping, legume cover cropping, animal integration, non-chemical fertilizer, non-chemical pest management, and no tillage. Results Our findings indicate that all seven practices effectively increased the carbon sequestration rate. There were no statistically significant differences among the practices. Combining these practices may further enhance soil carbon sequestration. Discussion We propose a sequence of regenerative practices that farmers can adopt, balancing ease of implementation and carbon sequestration effectiveness. To address under-studied practices, we recommend further research, including long-term monitoring studies and randomized controlled trials in perennial systems. Our recommendations aim to enhance the implementation and effectiveness of regenerative practices while mitigating the current challenge of limited sample sizes for quantifying carbon sequestration.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jessica Villat
Harvard University Press
Kimberly A. Nicholas
Lund University
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Harvard University Press
Lund University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Villat et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12f61645487b7639a773e2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1234108
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: